– Advertisement –
Lee Marmon – ca.1990 – photographer unknownWe went to the Albuquerque Museum this morning to see the Lee Marmon exhibit, Between Two Worlds. There is a small however consultant collection of Marmon’s work. The narrative commentary on the entrance of the exhibit is disappointing as a result of it simply parrots a tiring, contrived comparability of the work of Marmon to his predecessors, Edward Curtis and Charles Lummis,
There isn’t any arguing the truth that Lee Marmon, a local son of the Laguna Pueblo, had quick access to his Native American topics which made them comfy in entrance of his digicam. Contrary to the assertions made within the exhibit, nevertheless, there’s little or no actual distinction between his photographic method and strategies and people of Curtis and Lummis.
– Advertisement –
The exhibit materials implies that Curtis and Lummis had been condescending towards their Native American topics, and that they misrepresented them as members of a disappearing race. I don’t recall studying something stated by both that portrayed their topics with any negativity. Curtis endured nice hardship in documenting all of the tribal teams he may discover and by no means realized any vital revenue from his efforts. Lummis lived within the Isleta Pueblo and clearly loved the belief and affection of his neighbors.
– Advertisement –
As for the portrayal of the American Indians as at risk of disappearance towards the tip of the nineteenth Century, I feel we will lower Curtis and Lummis some slack. The indigenous folks of the nation had by that point been subjected to a few centuries of genocidal warfare. Additionally, it has develop into rising clear that properly into the Twentieth Century there was a concerted effort collectively by the federal government and spiritual organizations to stamp out indigenous languages and cultures by ripping the kids away from their households and confining them in prison-like boarding colleges . ,Marmon ran away from the Albuquerque Indian School.)
The cost that Curtis and Lummis posed their topics, typically utilizing synthetic lighting, merely overlooks the realities of nineteenth Century pictures. Curtis and Lummis made their images on glass plates utilizing giant and cumbersome view cameras. Spontaneous snapshots of on a regular basis life weren’t a sensible choice, although Lummis truly acquired fairly near that with a few of his cyanotypes.
– Advertisement –
Marmon made most of his photos of Pueblo folks in outside settings and had no want for synthetic lighting. He did usually use a considerably cumbersome press digicam, however it was loaded with movie that was vastly extra delicate than these nineteenth Century glass plates of his predecessors. Marmon used flash for his business movie star portrait work as was the customized in these days.
Curtis definitely did go to some lengths to painting his topics principally in conventional regalia which was not usually seen outdoors ceremonial actions. But, guess what; most of Marmon’s photos of his folks present them carrying conventional garb and jewellery which they clearly donned for the event. Not unsurprisingly, because the exhibit materials factors out, Marmon by no means had a unfavorable factor to say in regards to the photographic approaches of Curtis and Lummis. In truth, Marmon was doing his finest to emulate the posing conventions of his day which weren’t all that completely different from the approaches of Curtis and Lummis.
It appears to me it ought to be doable to acknowledge what is exclusive and helpful in Marmon’s accomplishments with out making an attempt to show Curtis and Lummis into villainous antagonists in a method that Marmon himself by no means endorsed.
– Advertisement –
